The provider decides what becomes part of the record.
Generated content remains editable. Review and signature establish the final note; the system does not autonomously make clinical decisions.
Can an AI scribe finish the draft before the next patient?
Capture the encounter or dictate afterward. Charts structures the clinical draft and suggests ICD-10 and CPT context while the provider keeps final control.
AI-assisted draft · discipline-aware structure · provider review · chart and superbill handoff
One encounter. Four controlled steps.
Automation accelerates the work; it does not remove clinical judgment or the provider signature.
- 01
Capture
Record the encounter or add a focused post-visit dictation.
- 02
Structure
Generate a draft using the selected discipline, note type, and template.
- 03
Review
Inspect clinical content, completeness flags, diagnoses, and code suggestions.
- 04
Sign + hand off
Finalize the record and pass approved visit context toward checkout and billing.
LIVE / 01
The working scribe surface
This capture comes from the authorized Charts demo tenant with synthetic records. The interface keeps recording, note output, and code output in the same clinical workspace.
- Ambient or dictated input
- Note-type and discipline context
- Reviewable note and code outputs
- Provider-controlled final signature
The draft belongs inside the longitudinal patient chart.
History, prior notes, diagnoses, documents, treatment-plan context, and the current encounter stay accessible without moving text between products.
Surface risk before the chart disappears into a queue.
Insight checks can call attention to completeness, repetition, coding alignment, and documentation risk while preserving the reviewer audit trail.
Approved context can move without a second transcription.
Diagnoses, services, patient, provider, and encounter information connect to checkout, superbill review, payer rules, and claims.
Shared operating system. Discipline-aware documentation.
A mixed team can use one patient, schedule, claim, and report without forcing every clinician into the same note structure.
- Chiropractic
- SOAP, imaging, treatment plan, PI, and DACBAR context
- PT + rehab
- Evaluations, goals, outcomes, progress, HEP, and RTM context
- Acupuncture
- Discipline-aware visit structures inside the shared patient record
- Integrative care
- Custom templates and longitudinal documentation across provider roles
AI scribe questions from clinical teams
Direct answers about fit, migration, ownership, AI review, and the connected platform.
01Does the AI scribe finalize notes or codes on its own?
No. The scribe creates an AI-assisted draft and coding suggestions. The treating provider reviews, edits, and signs the record before it is finalized.
02Can providers dictate after the visit instead of recording the encounter?
Yes. The workflow supports ambient encounter capture and post-visit dictation. In both cases, the output remains a draft until the provider reviews, edits, and signs it.
03Does the scribe support different disciplines and note types?
Charts is designed around discipline- and note-type-aware structures for chiropractic, physical therapy and rehab, acupuncture, integrative care, and mixed clinical teams.
04How do code suggestions reach billing?
ICD-10 and CPT suggestions appear in the documentation workflow for clinical review. Approved visit context can then continue into the superbill and claims workflow without re-keying the patient and encounter.
05Can a practice still use its own note templates?
Yes. Teams can define reusable evaluation, daily-note, progress-note, discharge, goal, table, and custom content structures alongside the AI-assisted draft workflow.
Bring one difficult note type to the demo.
We’ll show the capture, draft, review, coding context, and chart handoff with synthetic patient data.